é É « » à è ù ç ô é
Operational risk: definition, types and controls
‹ Revenir en arrière | Glossaire

Operational risk: definition, types and controls

What is Operational Risk?

Operational risk is the potential for financial loss or business disruption caused by failed internal processes, people, systems, or external events. For audit and compliance teams, it covers everything from employee fraud and unauthorized transactions to system outages and data integrity breakdowns that distort financial reporting.

Types of operational risk in a corporate context

Process failures happen when workflows lack approval controls or duties are not properly segregated, opening the door to errors and unauthorized entries. People risk covers employee fraud, policy breaches, and misconduct. System risk includes outages, corrupted data, and cybersecurity incidents that interrupt business continuity.

Two categories are easy to underestimate. External events such as regulatory shifts or vendor failures hit operations from outside the company's control. And data integrity issues (duplicate entries, misclassifications, unreconciled items) sit quietly in the ledger until an audit surfaces them, often several quarters later.

How internal controls prevent operational risk

Mitigation relies on layered controls rather than a single safeguard. Authorization limits tied to role and transaction type block spending outside policy. Segregation of duties ensures no one person can initiate, approve, and record the same transaction, which stops most unauthorized activity at the point of entry.

Detective controls catch what prevention misses. Continuous monitoring flags out-of-policy and duplicate transactions as they happen, while monthly reconciliation verifies balances and investigates unmatched items. Reducing the gap between a control failure and its discovery is what limits the financial impact.

Operational Risk and Supervizor

Supervizor's AI-powered risk discovery platform analyzes 100% of financial transactions rather than a sample, surfacing process failures, unauthorized entries, and statistical anomalies that manual testing misses. Concretely, it lets teams:

  • Detect fraud patterns in minutes rather than months, including duplicate claims, split transactions, and spending above authorization limits
  • Automate control testing across segregation of duties, approval chains, and policy thresholds without manual sampling
  • Maintain continuous compliance against internal policy and regulatory requirements instead of relying on annual audit cycles

Related Supervizor pages